Fairfield

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.6%Fairfield

69.4%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -5.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.4

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -227

Quinnipiac

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFairfield 73

Projected Total150.4

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78

Team Comparison

FairfieldMetricQuinnipiac

49.7MMH Power Index51.8

109.3Offensive Efficiency109.4

106.7Defensive Efficiency105.1

2.6Net Efficiency4.3

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

68.4Tempo69.8

51.3%Effective FG%51.2%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.4%

32.1%Offensive Rebound %31.6%

33.9%Free Throw Rate35.4%

1.8Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.8–49.7), offensive efficiency (109.4–109.3), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.7), net efficiency (4.3–2.6).

Fairfield COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–51.2), ball security (16.3–16.4), offensive rebounding (32.1–31.6).