Incarnate Word
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.7%Incarnate Word
74.3%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -6.9
PROJECTED TOTAL149.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -289
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 71
Projected Total149.0
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 78
Team Comparison
47.6MMH Power Index52.7
109.2Offensive Efficiency110.3
108.9Defensive Efficiency105.9
0.3Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.7Tempo68.2
52.0%Effective FG%52.9%
16.7%Turnover Rate17.0%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
35.3%Free Throw Rate34.2%
0.2Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.6), offensive efficiency (110.3–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.9–108.9), net efficiency (4.4–0.3).
Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHball security (16.7–17.0), offensive rebounding (31.7–30.4), free throw rate (35.3–34.2).