Bellarmine

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

22.3%Bellarmine

77.7%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -8.1

PROJECTED TOTAL156.2

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -348

Queens University

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBellarmine 74

Projected Total156.2

Projected ScoreQueens University 82

Team Comparison

BellarmineMetricQueens University

43.8MMH Power Index50.3

109.8Offensive Efficiency111.6

112.9Defensive Efficiency109.5

-3.1Net Efficiency2.1

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9

-3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1

68.0Tempo70.2

54.0%Effective FG%53.1%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.2%

28.8%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

35.7%Free Throw Rate36.2%

-2.2Average Margin1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–43.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–109.8), defensive efficiency (109.5–112.9), net efficiency (2.1–-3.1).

Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.0–53.1).