
Hofstra
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.6%Hofstra
37.4%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -167

Campbell
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreCampbell 74
Team Comparison
57.3MMH Power Index44.5
112.2Offensive Efficiency107.9
103.8Defensive Efficiency109.8
8.4Net Efficiency-1.9
-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4
8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.9
67.6Tempo69.8
52.0%Effective FG%51.8%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.9%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
34.8%Free Throw Rate37.9%
5.7Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–44.5), offensive efficiency (112.2–107.9), defensive efficiency (103.8–109.8), net efficiency (8.4–-1.9).
Campbell COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.9–34.8).