Quinnipiac
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Quinnipiac
60.1%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -151
Siena
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 73
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreSiena 75
Team Comparison
51.8MMH Power Index49.6
109.4Offensive Efficiency108.9
105.1Defensive Efficiency106.3
4.3Net Efficiency2.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
69.8Tempo66.7
51.2%Effective FG%51.7%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.5%
31.6%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
35.4%Free Throw Rate35.6%
3.0Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.4–108.9), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.3), net efficiency (4.3–2.6).
Siena COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.2), free throw rate (35.6–35.4).