Tulane logo

Tulane

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.3%Tulane
65.7%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL150.6
MODEL MONEYLINERice -192
Rice logo

Rice

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 73
Projected Total150.6
Projected ScoreRice 77

Team Comparison

45.7MMH Power Index45.6
106.9Offensive Efficiency107.2
109.1Defensive Efficiency109.5
-2.2Net Efficiency-2.3
0.8Strength of Schedule0.8
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
68.9Tempo68.7
51.4%Effective FG%51.4%
16.4%Turnover Rate17.0%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %32.0%
38.0%Free Throw Rate35.5%
-1.5Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.7–45.6), defensive efficiency (109.1–109.5), net efficiency (-2.2–-2.3), recent form (-2.2–-2.3).
Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.2–106.9), offensive rebounding (32.0–28.8).