Lipscomb

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.9%Lipscomb

71.1%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.8

PROJECTED TOTAL154.9

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -246

Queens University

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 75

Projected Total154.9

Projected ScoreQueens University 80

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricQueens University

47.8MMH Power Index50.3

108.5Offensive Efficiency111.6

108.5Defensive Efficiency109.5

0.0Net Efficiency2.1

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9

0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1

68.9Tempo70.2

52.7%Effective FG%53.1%

16.5%Turnover Rate16.2%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

33.5%Free Throw Rate36.2%

0.0Average Margin1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–47.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–108.5), net efficiency (2.1–0.0), recent form (2.1–0.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.5–109.5).