
Hofstra
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.3%Hofstra
56.7%Charleston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL149.1
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -131

Charleston
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total149.1
Projected ScoreCharleston 75
Team Comparison
57.3MMH Power Index53.2
112.2Offensive Efficiency110.6
103.8Defensive Efficiency105.5
8.4Net Efficiency5.1
-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4
8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency5.2
67.6Tempo69.1
52.0%Effective FG%51.6%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.5%
34.8%Free Throw Rate37.4%
5.7Average Margin3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Charleston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–53.2), offensive efficiency (112.2–110.6), defensive efficiency (103.8–105.5), net efficiency (8.4–5.1).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHball security (16.4–16.5), free throw rate (37.4–34.8).