Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.0%Texas A&M
75.0%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -300
Vanderbilt logo

Vanderbilt

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 74
Projected Total154.6
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81

Team Comparison

53.7MMH Power Index58.6
111.8Offensive Efficiency114.0
106.6Defensive Efficiency104.9
5.2Net Efficiency9.1
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.2
69.1Tempo70.0
52.4%Effective FG%52.8%
16.2%Turnover Rate15.9%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
36.2%Free Throw Rate36.7%
3.6Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–53.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–111.8), defensive efficiency (104.9–106.6), net efficiency (9.1–5.2).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–30.8).