Houston Christian
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.5%Houston Christian
78.5%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -365
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHouston Christian 69
Projected Total147.2
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 78
Team Comparison
45.4MMH Power Index52.7
107.0Offensive Efficiency110.3
108.5Defensive Efficiency105.9
-1.5Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.2Tempo68.2
51.5%Effective FG%52.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate17.0%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
36.1%Free Throw Rate34.2%
-1.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–45.4), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.0), defensive efficiency (105.9–108.5), net efficiency (4.4–-1.5).
Houston Christian COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.7–30.4), free throw rate (36.1–34.2).