
Columbia
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.1%Columbia
82.9%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -10.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -485

Pennsylvania
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 70
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScorePennsylvania 81
Team Comparison
52.2MMH Power Index62.4
111.0Offensive Efficiency114.8
105.7Defensive Efficiency101.2
5.3Net Efficiency13.6
-0.6Strength of Schedule-0.6
5.3Last 10 Net Efficiency13.6
68.6Tempo69.5
52.6%Effective FG%51.7%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.4%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
34.0%Free Throw Rate35.9%
3.6Average Margin9.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.4–52.2), offensive efficiency (114.8–111.0), defensive efficiency (101.2–105.7), net efficiency (13.6–5.3).
Columbia COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–51.7), offensive rebounding (32.4–30.9).