UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
59.0%Texas A&M-Corpus Christi
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M-Corpus Christi -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M-Corpus Christi -144
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi logo

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreTexas A&M-Corpus Christi 75

Team Comparison

52.7MMH Power Index49.5
110.3Offensive Efficiency107.7
105.9Defensive Efficiency105.8
4.4Net Efficiency1.9
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8
68.2Tempo68.7
52.9%Effective FG%51.9%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
34.2%Free Throw Rate36.8%
3.0Average Margin1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–49.5), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.7), net efficiency (4.4–1.9), recent form (4.4–1.8).
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.8–105.9), offensive rebounding (31.4–30.4), free throw rate (36.8–34.2).