
Vanderbilt
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.4%Vanderbilt
50.6%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -102

LSU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 78
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreLSU 79
Team Comparison
58.6MMH Power Index52
114.0Offensive Efficiency111.4
104.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
9.1Net Efficiency3.8
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
9.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
70.0Tempo69.8
52.8%Effective FG%52.3%
15.9%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
36.7%Free Throw Rate37.3%
6.4Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–52.0), offensive efficiency (114.0–111.4), defensive efficiency (104.9–107.6), net efficiency (9.1–3.8).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.4–30.8), free throw rate (37.3–36.7).