Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

55.8%Colgate

44.2%Loyola Maryland

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADColgate -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL151.8

MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -126

Loyola Maryland

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 77

Projected Total151.8

Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 75

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricLoyola Maryland

47.8MMH Power Index38.2

109.5Offensive Efficiency105.4

107.9Defensive Efficiency111.5

1.6Net Efficiency-6.1

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.1

68.7Tempo69.3

52.6%Effective FG%51.8%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.4%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.6%

1.1Average Margin-4.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Colgate HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–38.2), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.4), defensive efficiency (107.9–111.5), net efficiency (1.6–-6.1).

Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.4–29.8), free throw rate (34.6–34.3).