
Drexel
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.6%Drexel
71.4%Northeastern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNortheastern -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINENortheastern -250

Northeastern
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 72
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreNortheastern 78
Team Comparison
43.4MMH Power Index46.4
105.5Offensive Efficiency108.8
108.3Defensive Efficiency109.2
-2.8Net Efficiency-0.4
-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4
-2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
67.4Tempo69.5
51.8%Effective FG%52.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.6%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
34.9%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-1.9Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Northeastern HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNortheastern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.4–43.4), offensive efficiency (108.8–105.5), net efficiency (-0.4–-2.8), recent form (-0.3–-2.8).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.3–109.2), offensive rebounding (30.8–29.8), free throw rate (34.9–34.3).