Rice

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

59.5%Rice

40.5%UTSA

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -2.5

PROJECTED TOTAL151.4

MODEL MONEYLINERice -147

UTSA

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRice 77

Projected Total151.4

Projected ScoreUTSA 74

Team Comparison

RiceMetricUTSA

45.6MMH Power Index34.7

107.2Offensive Efficiency102.3

109.5Defensive Efficiency113.4

-2.3Net Efficiency-11.1

0.8Strength of Schedule0.8

-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.1

68.7Tempo69.6

51.4%Effective FG%50.5%

17.0%Turnover Rate16.8%

32.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

35.5%Free Throw Rate34.3%

-1.6Average Margin-7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.6–34.7), offensive efficiency (107.2–102.3), defensive efficiency (109.5–113.4), net efficiency (-2.3–-11.1).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0).