Merrimack

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

75.6%Merrimack

24.4%Rider

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -7.3

PROJECTED TOTAL144.8

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -310

Rider

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 76

Projected Total144.8

Projected ScoreRider 69

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricRider

51.9MMH Power Index32.1

109.6Offensive Efficiency101.8

105.1Defensive Efficiency113.4

4.5Net Efficiency-11.6

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

66.7Tempo67.5

51.3%Effective FG%49.8%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.8%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %31.3%

36.7%Free Throw Rate34.7%

3.0Average Margin-7.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–32.1), offensive efficiency (109.6–101.8), defensive efficiency (105.1–113.4), net efficiency (4.5–-11.6).

Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.3–29.3).