Nicholls
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.5%Nicholls
75.5%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL149.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -308
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNicholls 71
Projected Total149.6
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 78
Team Comparison
47.2MMH Power Index52.7
107.9Offensive Efficiency110.3
107.9Defensive Efficiency105.9
0.0Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
68.9Tempo68.2
51.7%Effective FG%52.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
30.2%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
35.7%Free Throw Rate34.2%
0.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.2), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.9), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.9), net efficiency (4.4–0.0).
Nicholls COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0), free throw rate (35.7–34.2).