Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.7%Colgate

64.3%Boston University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBoston University -3.8

PROJECTED TOTAL150.0

MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -180

Boston University

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 73

Projected Total150.0

Projected ScoreBoston University 77

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricBoston University

47.8MMH Power Index47.4

109.5Offensive Efficiency110.3

107.9Defensive Efficiency109.0

1.6Net Efficiency1.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency1.3

68.7Tempo67.2

52.6%Effective FG%53.6%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.9%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %29.9%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.9%

1.1Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Boston University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–47.4), defensive efficiency (107.9–109.0), net efficiency (1.6–1.3), recent form (1.6–1.3).

Boston University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–109.5), shooting efficiency (53.6–52.6), offensive rebounding (29.9–29.8).