
Syracuse
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.9%Syracuse
67.1%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL147.2
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -204

Clemson
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSyracuse 71
Projected Total147.2
Projected ScoreClemson 76
Team Comparison
58.7MMH Power Index59.9
111.6Offensive Efficiency111.9
104.6Defensive Efficiency103.9
7.0Net Efficiency8.0
5.5Strength of Schedule5.5
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
69.0Tempo66.3
52.2%Effective FG%52.2%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.0%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
35.9%Free Throw Rate36.4%
4.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–58.7), offensive efficiency (111.9–111.6), defensive efficiency (103.9–104.6), net efficiency (8.0–7.0).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.3–29.8).