
Siena
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.5%Siena
69.5%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.3
PROJECTED TOTAL143.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -228

Merrimack
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSiena 69
Projected Total143.8
Projected ScoreMerrimack 75
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index51.9
108.9Offensive Efficiency109.6
106.3Defensive Efficiency105.1
2.6Net Efficiency4.5
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
66.7Tempo66.7
51.7%Effective FG%51.3%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.2%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %29.3%
35.6%Free Throw Rate36.7%
1.7Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.6–108.9), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.3), net efficiency (4.5–2.6).
Siena COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.3), offensive rebounding (30.9–29.3).