Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.1%Queens University
58.9%Jacksonville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADJacksonville -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINEJacksonville -143
Jacksonville
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScoreJacksonville 78
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index47.3
111.6Offensive Efficiency108.5
109.5Defensive Efficiency108.8
2.1Net Efficiency-0.3
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4
70.2Tempo67.8
53.1%Effective FG%51.9%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.5%
36.2%Free Throw Rate35.3%
1.4Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Jacksonville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–47.3), offensive efficiency (111.6–108.5), net efficiency (2.1–-0.3), recent form (2.1–-0.4).
Jacksonville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.8–109.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–30.5).