UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.7%UT Rio Grande Valley
70.3%Stephen F. Austin
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStephen F. Austin -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEStephen F. Austin -237
Stephen F. Austin
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 71
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreStephen F. Austin 77
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index54.6
110.3Offensive Efficiency110.8
105.9Defensive Efficiency104.9
4.4Net Efficiency5.9
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency6.0
68.2Tempo68.0
52.9%Effective FG%52.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.0%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
34.2%Free Throw Rate34.4%
3.0Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stephen F. Austin HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStephen F. Austin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (110.8–110.3), defensive efficiency (104.9–105.9), net efficiency (5.9–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–52.0).