
Pennsylvania
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.7%Pennsylvania
42.3%Columbia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -136

Columbia
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 77
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreColumbia 75
Team Comparison
62.4MMH Power Index52.2
114.8Offensive Efficiency111.0
101.2Defensive Efficiency105.7
13.6Net Efficiency5.3
-0.6Strength of Schedule-0.6
13.6Last 10 Net Efficiency5.3
69.5Tempo68.6
51.7%Effective FG%52.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
35.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%
9.4Average Margin3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.4–52.2), offensive efficiency (114.8–111.0), defensive efficiency (101.2–105.7), net efficiency (13.6–5.3).
Columbia COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–51.7), offensive rebounding (32.4–30.9).