UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
45.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
54.4%Lamar
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLamar -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.6
MODEL MONEYLINELamar -119
Lamar
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73
Projected Total147.6
Projected ScoreLamar 74
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index47.4
110.3Offensive Efficiency107.3
105.9Defensive Efficiency107.2
4.4Net Efficiency0.1
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency0.2
68.2Tempo67.8
52.9%Effective FG%51.2%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.0%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %32.0%
34.2%Free Throw Rate34.0%
3.0Average Margin0.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lamar HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.4), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.3), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.2), net efficiency (4.4–0.1).
Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.0–30.4).