SMU
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.1%SMU
38.9%Boston College
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.5
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -157
Boston College
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 77
Projected Total151.5
Projected ScoreBoston College 74
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index47.9
113.3Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
7.4Net Efficiency-1.7
5.5Strength of Schedule5.5
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.7
70.1Tempo68.2
52.9%Effective FG%50.8%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.1%
34.7%Free Throw Rate35.1%
5.2Average Margin-1.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–47.9), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.9), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.6), net efficiency (7.4–-1.7).
Boston College COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (35.1–34.7).