Holy Cross
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.2%Holy Cross
80.8%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL149.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -421
Colgate
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHoly Cross 70
Projected Total149.0
Projected ScoreColgate 79
Team Comparison
39.1MMH Power Index47.8
105.2Offensive Efficiency109.5
110.6Defensive Efficiency107.9
-5.4Net Efficiency1.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6
67.6Tempo68.7
51.4%Effective FG%52.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.2%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
35.0%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-3.6Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–39.1), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.2), defensive efficiency (107.9–110.6), net efficiency (1.6–-5.4).
Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (35.0–34.3).