Charleston

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.0%Charleston

73.0%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -6.4

PROJECTED TOTAL149.1

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -270

Hofstra

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCharleston 71

Projected Total149.1

Projected ScoreHofstra 78

Team Comparison

CharlestonMetricHofstra

53.2MMH Power Index57.3

110.6Offensive Efficiency112.2

105.5Defensive Efficiency103.8

5.1Net Efficiency8.4

-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4

5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.5

69.1Tempo67.6

51.6%Effective FG%52.0%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.5%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.8%

37.4%Free Throw Rate34.8%

3.6Average Margin5.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–53.2), offensive efficiency (112.2–110.6), defensive efficiency (103.8–105.5), net efficiency (8.4–5.1).

Charleston COUNTERS WITHball security (16.4–16.5), free throw rate (37.4–34.8).