Merrimack

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

66.4%Merrimack

33.6%Niagara

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -4.4

PROJECTED TOTAL143.3

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -198

Niagara

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 74

Projected Total143.3

Projected ScoreNiagara 69

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricNiagara

51.9MMH Power Index37.5

109.6Offensive Efficiency104.2

105.1Defensive Efficiency111.4

4.5Net Efficiency-7.2

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

66.7Tempo66.2

51.3%Effective FG%51.7%

16.2%Turnover Rate17.2%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

36.7%Free Throw Rate33.7%

3.0Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–37.5), offensive efficiency (109.6–104.2), defensive efficiency (105.1–111.4), net efficiency (4.5–-7.2).

Niagara COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.3).