Chattanooga

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

37.8%Chattanooga

62.2%Mercer

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMercer -3.2

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMercer -165

Mercer

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 75

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScoreMercer 78

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricMercer

48.2MMH Power Index46.2

110.0Offensive Efficiency109.2

108.1Defensive Efficiency108.9

1.9Net Efficiency0.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9

1.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3

68.6Tempo70.0

52.8%Effective FG%52.4%

16.0%Turnover Rate16.2%

29.0%Offensive Rebound %31.5%

34.1%Free Throw Rate36.6%

1.3Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Mercer HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChattanooga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.2–46.2), offensive efficiency (110.0–109.2), defensive efficiency (108.1–108.9), net efficiency (1.9–0.3).

Mercer COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.5–29.0), free throw rate (36.6–34.1).