Kent State
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.7%Kent State
59.3%Buffalo
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBuffalo -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL155.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBuffalo -146
Buffalo
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 77
Projected Total155.6
Projected ScoreBuffalo 79
Team Comparison
54MMH Power Index51.5
112.1Offensive Efficiency111.8
105.6Defensive Efficiency107.3
6.5Net Efficiency4.5
-0.9Strength of Schedule-0.9
6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5
71.5Tempo68.5
52.2%Effective FG%53.0%
16.9%Turnover Rate16.5%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
37.7%Free Throw Rate36.9%
4.6Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Buffalo HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–51.5), offensive efficiency (112.1–111.8), defensive efficiency (105.6–107.3), net efficiency (6.5–4.5).
Buffalo COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.0–52.2), ball security (16.5–16.9).