Stetson
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.9%Stetson
82.1%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -9.9
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -459
Queens University
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 73
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreQueens University 83
Team Comparison
40.9MMH Power Index50.3
106.3Offensive Efficiency111.6
111.8Defensive Efficiency109.5
-5.5Net Efficiency2.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9
-5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
68.9Tempo70.2
52.4%Effective FG%53.1%
17.1%Turnover Rate16.2%
30.1%Offensive Rebound %30.5%
35.2%Free Throw Rate36.2%
-3.8Average Margin1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–40.9), offensive efficiency (111.6–106.3), defensive efficiency (109.5–111.8), net efficiency (2.1–-5.5).