
Lipscomb
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.0%Lipscomb
57.0%Bellarmine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBellarmine -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBellarmine -133

Bellarmine
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 75
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreBellarmine 77
Team Comparison
47.8MMH Power Index43.8
108.5Offensive Efficiency109.8
108.5Defensive Efficiency112.9
0.0Net Efficiency-3.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.2
68.9Tempo68.0
52.7%Effective FG%54.0%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
33.5%Free Throw Rate35.7%
0.0Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bellarmine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–43.8), defensive efficiency (108.5–112.9), net efficiency (0.0–-3.1), recent form (0.0–-3.2).
Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.8–108.5), shooting efficiency (54.0–52.7), ball security (16.3–16.5).