Stanford
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Stanford
76.5%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -7.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.0
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -326
Clemson
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStanford 70
Projected Total147.0
Projected ScoreClemson 77
Team Comparison
53.5MMH Power Index59.9
109.9Offensive Efficiency111.9
107.1Defensive Efficiency103.9
2.8Net Efficiency8.0
5.5Strength of Schedule5.5
2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
68.6Tempo66.3
52.0%Effective FG%52.2%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.0%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
36.1%Free Throw Rate36.4%
1.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–53.5), offensive efficiency (111.9–109.9), defensive efficiency (103.9–107.1), net efficiency (8.0–2.8).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.2–29.8).