
Yale
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.7%Yale
83.3%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.8
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -499

Pennsylvania
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreYale 70
Projected Total149.8
Projected ScorePennsylvania 80
Team Comparison
51.6MMH Power Index62.4
112.0Offensive Efficiency114.8
107.1Defensive Efficiency101.2
4.9Net Efficiency13.6
-0.6Strength of Schedule-0.6
4.8Last 10 Net Efficiency13.6
66.8Tempo69.5
53.2%Effective FG%51.7%
16.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
35.4%Free Throw Rate35.9%
3.2Average Margin9.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.4–51.6), offensive efficiency (114.8–112.0), defensive efficiency (101.2–107.1), net efficiency (13.6–4.9).
Yale COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.2–51.7), ball security (16.0–16.4), offensive rebounding (31.4–30.9).