McNeese
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
46.9%McNeese
53.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.8
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -113
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMcNeese 74
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75
Team Comparison
57.6MMH Power Index52.7
112.3Offensive Efficiency110.3
103.9Defensive Efficiency105.9
8.4Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
8.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.5Tempo68.2
52.0%Effective FG%52.9%
16.0%Turnover Rate17.0%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
36.3%Free Throw Rate34.2%
5.7Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (112.3–110.3), defensive efficiency (103.9–105.9), net efficiency (8.4–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–52.0).