UTEP

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.6%UTEP

87.4%Grand Canyon

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -12.6

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -694

Grand Canyon

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTEP 68

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 81

Team Comparison

UTEPMetricGrand Canyon

43.7MMH Power Index57.8

105.3Offensive Efficiency110.8

109.4Defensive Efficiency103.6

-4.1Net Efficiency7.2

1.8Strength of Schedule1.8

-4.2Last 10 Net Efficiency7.2

68.3Tempo69.2

51.3%Effective FG%52.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate16.9%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

35.7%Free Throw Rate37.1%

-2.9Average Margin5.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.8–43.7), offensive efficiency (110.8–105.3), defensive efficiency (103.6–109.4), net efficiency (7.2–-4.1).

UTEP COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–16.9).