
Kentucky
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.9%Kentucky
70.1%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL154.8
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -234

Vanderbilt
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKentucky 75
Projected Total154.8
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 80
Team Comparison
56.3MMH Power Index58.6
112.5Offensive Efficiency114.0
105.1Defensive Efficiency104.9
7.4Net Efficiency9.1
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency9.2
69.5Tempo70.0
52.3%Effective FG%52.8%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
36.3%Free Throw Rate36.7%
5.1Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–56.3), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.5), defensive efficiency (104.9–105.1), net efficiency (9.1–7.4).
Kentucky COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.4–30.8).