UAB

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.8%UAB

51.2%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL152.4

MODEL MONEYLINERice -105

Rice

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 76

Projected Total152.4

Projected ScoreRice 77

Team Comparison

UABMetricRice

51.6MMH Power Index45.6

109.1Offensive Efficiency107.2

106.5Defensive Efficiency109.5

2.6Net Efficiency-2.3

0.8Strength of Schedule0.8

2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3

70.4Tempo68.7

51.2%Effective FG%51.4%

15.6%Turnover Rate17.0%

31.3%Offensive Rebound %32.0%

36.1%Free Throw Rate35.5%

1.8Average Margin-1.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–45.6), offensive efficiency (109.1–107.2), defensive efficiency (106.5–109.5), net efficiency (2.6–-2.3).

Rice COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.4–51.2), offensive rebounding (32.0–31.3).