Grambling

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.3%Grambling

69.7%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL149.9

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -230

Florida A&M

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 72

Projected Total149.9

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 78

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricFlorida A&M

38.4MMH Power Index40.6

103.2Offensive Efficiency104.5

109.3Defensive Efficiency108.8

-6.1Net Efficiency-4.3

-5.1Strength of Schedule-5.1

-6.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

69.5Tempo69.8

51.3%Effective FG%51.3%

17.7%Turnover Rate17.9%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

37.4%Free Throw Rate36.3%

-4.3Average Margin-3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.6–38.4), offensive efficiency (104.5–103.2), defensive efficiency (108.8–109.3), net efficiency (-4.3–-6.1).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHball security (17.7–17.9), free throw rate (37.4–36.3).