Loyola Maryland
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.3%Loyola Maryland
81.7%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.8
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -446
Colgate
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 71
Projected Total151.8
Projected ScoreColgate 81
Team Comparison
38.2MMH Power Index47.8
105.4Offensive Efficiency109.5
111.5Defensive Efficiency107.9
-6.1Net Efficiency1.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
-6.1Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6
69.3Tempo68.7
51.8%Effective FG%52.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.2%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
34.6%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-4.2Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–38.2), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.4), defensive efficiency (107.9–111.5), net efficiency (1.6–-6.1).
Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.4–29.8), free throw rate (34.6–34.3).