Chicago State
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.3%Chicago State
67.7%Stonehill
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStonehill -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -210
Stonehill
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreChicago State 71
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreStonehill 76
Team Comparison
37.3MMH Power Index38.7
105.1Offensive Efficiency103.7
110.7Defensive Efficiency108.1
-5.6Net Efficiency-4.4
-4.6Strength of Schedule-4.6
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.4
67.6Tempo68.6
50.4%Effective FG%51.0%
16.5%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.2%
34.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-3.8Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stonehill HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.7–37.3), defensive efficiency (108.1–110.7), net efficiency (-4.4–-5.6), recent form (-4.4–-5.6).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.1–103.7), ball security (16.5–17.3), offensive rebounding (30.4–30.2).