Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.6%Queens University
50.4%Bellarmine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBellarmine -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL156.2
MODEL MONEYLINEBellarmine -102
Bellarmine
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 78
Projected Total156.2
Projected ScoreBellarmine 79
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index43.8
111.6Offensive Efficiency109.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency112.9
2.1Net Efficiency-3.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.9
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.2
70.2Tempo68.0
53.1%Effective FG%54.0%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.3%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
36.2%Free Throw Rate35.7%
1.4Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bellarmine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–43.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–109.8), defensive efficiency (109.5–112.9), net efficiency (2.1–-3.1).
Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.0–53.1).