Hofstra

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.8%Hofstra

34.2%Drexel

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -4.2

PROJECTED TOTAL145.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -192

Drexel

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 75

Projected Total145.9

Projected ScoreDrexel 71

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricDrexel

57.3MMH Power Index43.4

112.2Offensive Efficiency105.5

103.8Defensive Efficiency108.3

8.4Net Efficiency-2.8

-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.4

8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8

67.6Tempo67.4

52.0%Effective FG%51.8%

16.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

34.8%Free Throw Rate34.9%

5.7Average Margin-1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–43.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–105.5), defensive efficiency (103.8–108.3), net efficiency (8.4–-2.8).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.9–34.8).