
Tulsa
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.9%Tulsa
42.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.5
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -138

UAB
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 78
Projected Total154.5
Projected ScoreUAB 76
Team Comparison
62.1MMH Power Index51.6
114.9Offensive Efficiency109.1
103.9Defensive Efficiency106.5
11.0Net Efficiency2.6
0.8Strength of Schedule0.8
11.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
69.6Tempo70.4
52.8%Effective FG%51.2%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
31.5%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
37.4%Free Throw Rate36.1%
7.7Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–51.6), offensive efficiency (114.9–109.1), defensive efficiency (103.9–106.5), net efficiency (11.0–2.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–16.4).