Canisius

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.5%Canisius

57.5%Rider

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRider -2.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.7

MODEL MONEYLINERider -135

Rider

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCanisius 71

Projected Total144.7

Projected ScoreRider 73

Team Comparison

CanisiusMetricRider

36MMH Power Index32.1

102.7Offensive Efficiency101.8

111.1Defensive Efficiency113.4

-8.4Net Efficiency-11.6

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-8.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

66.9Tempo67.5

50.7%Effective FG%49.8%

17.4%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.3%

34.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-5.6Average Margin-7.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rider HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCanisius holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.0–32.1), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.8), defensive efficiency (111.1–113.4), net efficiency (-8.4–-11.6).

Rider COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.4), offensive rebounding (31.3–30.4).