Alabama A&M

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

40.5%Alabama A&M

59.5%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -2.5

PROJECTED TOTAL149.1

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -147

Grambling

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Projected Total149.1

Projected ScoreGrambling 76

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricGrambling

40.8MMH Power Index38.4

105.6Offensive Efficiency103.2

109.8Defensive Efficiency109.3

-4.2Net Efficiency-6.1

-5.1Strength of Schedule-5.1

-4.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.1

68.5Tempo69.5

51.4%Effective FG%51.3%

16.7%Turnover Rate17.7%

30.1%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

38.3%Free Throw Rate37.4%

-2.9Average Margin-4.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.8–38.4), offensive efficiency (105.6–103.2), net efficiency (-4.2–-6.1), recent form (-4.2–-6.1).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.3–109.8), offensive rebounding (30.7–30.1).