Texas A&M
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.4%Texas A&M
70.6%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -5.7
PROJECTED TOTAL153.3
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -240
Kentucky
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 74
Projected Total153.3
Projected ScoreKentucky 79
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index56.3
111.8Offensive Efficiency112.5
106.6Defensive Efficiency105.1
5.2Net Efficiency7.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
69.1Tempo69.5
52.4%Effective FG%52.3%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
36.2%Free Throw Rate36.3%
3.6Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.3–53.7), offensive efficiency (112.5–111.8), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.6), net efficiency (7.4–5.2).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.4–52.3), ball security (16.2–16.4).