Alabama State
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.3%Alabama State
58.7%Grambling
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrambling -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL151.4
MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -142
Grambling
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama State 75
Projected Total151.4
Projected ScoreGrambling 77
Team Comparison
41.3MMH Power Index38.4
105.4Offensive Efficiency103.2
109.2Defensive Efficiency109.3
-3.8Net Efficiency-6.1
-5.1Strength of Schedule-5.1
-3.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.1
70.5Tempo69.5
51.0%Effective FG%51.3%
17.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
35.8%Free Throw Rate37.4%
-2.7Average Margin-4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grambling HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.3–38.4), offensive efficiency (105.4–103.2), defensive efficiency (109.2–109.3), net efficiency (-3.8–-6.1).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–51.0), free throw rate (37.4–35.8).