THE BOARD

The Numbers Behind the Noise.

MMH looks for what conventional rankings, records and the market may be missing.

SIGNATURE MODEL

Numbers Before Narratives.

MMH uses team efficiency, recent performance, strength of schedule and matchup data to produce independent game projections. Pregame predictions are frozen before tipoff so the model has to keep score of its own calls.

THE RECEIPTS

MMH Keeps Score of Itself

View every call →
1–0Model Record

Full MMH tracking begins with the 2026–27 season.

MMH POWER INDEX

Team Ratings

2025-26 season • 366 Division I teams
TEAMMMHOFFDEFNET
#25 Akron ZipsMid-American Conference
65.8122.7103.3+19.4
MMH MATCHUPS

Games

MATCHUPWIN PROBABILITYPROJECTED SCORETOTALMODEL SPREAD
USC at Michigan State • FINAL18-14 • 27-8Final Score: USC 51-80 Michigan State
Michigan State 94.8%USC 5.2%
68-86154.2Michigan State -18.5
Dartmouth at Harvard • FINAL11-16 • 17-12Final Score: Dartmouth 76-68 Harvard
Harvard 85.4%Dartmouth 14.6%
67-78145.3Harvard -11.5
Oregon at Rutgers • FINAL12-19 • 13-20Final Score: Oregon 85-88 Rutgers
Rutgers 54.4%Oregon 45.6%
72-74146.2Rutgers -1.6
Yale at Brown • FINAL23-7 • 9-18Final Score: Yale 70-53 Brown
Yale 91.1%Brown 8.9%
78-66144.2Yale -12.0
Milwaukee at Green Bay • FINAL12-20 • 18-15Final Score: Milwaukee 76-79 Green Bay
Green Bay 75.8%Milwaukee 24.2%
74-82155.6Green Bay -7.9
Pennsylvania at Princeton • FINAL18-12 • 9-20Final Score: Pennsylvania 76-78 Princeton
Pennsylvania 63.1%Princeton 36.9%
74-72146.2Pennsylvania -2.2
William & Mary at Charleston • FINAL20-12 • 21-11Final Score: William & Mary 79-88 Charleston
Charleston 62.5%William & Mary 37.5%
77-81158.0Charleston -3.4
Lamar at SE Louisiana • FINAL12-19 • 9-21Final Score: Lamar 52-60 SE Louisiana
Lamar 52.3%SE Louisiana 47.7%
67-67133.3Lamar -0.2
Texas Southern at Grambling • FINAL12-17 • 14-19Final Score: Texas Southern 67-84 Grambling
Grambling 64.0%Texas Southern 36.0%
70-75144.4Grambling -5.3
Prairie View A&M at Southern • FINAL19-18 • 17-17Final Score: Prairie View A&M 89-85 Southern
Southern 69.7%Prairie View A&M 30.3%
77-83159.7Southern -5.9
Incarnate Word at UT Rio Grande Valley • FINAL12-19 • 19-14Final Score: Incarnate Word 67-80 UT Rio Grande Valley
UT Rio Grande Valley 85.3%Incarnate Word 14.7%
68-80147.9UT Rio Grande Valley -11.8
Northwestern State at Nicholls • FINAL10-21 • 14-19Final Score: Northwestern State 72-74 Nicholls
Nicholls 68.3%Northwestern State 31.7%
68-73141.2Nicholls -5.6
Stephen F. Austin at McNeese • FINAL28-6 • 27-6Final Score: Stephen F. Austin 64-66 McNeese
McNeese 77.6%Stephen F. Austin 22.4%
67-76143.0McNeese -8.2
Alabama A&M at Mississippi Valley State • FINAL18-15 • 3-30Final Score: Alabama A&M 71-51 Mississippi Valley State
Alabama A&M 90.3%Mississippi Valley State 9.7%
80-66146.9Alabama A&M -13.9
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi at Houston Christian • FINAL18-15 • 12-20Final Score: Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 81-65 Houston Christian
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 62.6%Houston Christian 37.4%
71-68139.2Texas A&M-Corpus Christi -3.2
East Texas A&M at New Orleans • FINAL11-21 • 16-18Final Score: East Texas A&M 73-83 New Orleans
New Orleans 81.4%East Texas A&M 18.6%
71-80150.7New Orleans -9.4
Massachusetts at Ohio • FINAL17-16 • 15-17Final Score: Massachusetts 83-86 Ohio
Ohio 53.0%Massachusetts 47.0%
80-81161.0Ohio -1.1
THE RECEIPTS

MMH Keeps Score of Itself

View every call →
1–0Model Record

Full MMH tracking begins with the 2026–27 season.

HOW TO READ IT

One projection. One permanent result.

MMH publishes its win probability, projected score and model spread before tipoff. The pregame prediction is then frozen so the result can be measured without hindsight.

ACCOUNTABILITY

Every prediction leaves a receipt.

MMH permanently records its pregame win probability, projected score and model spread before tipoff, then grades the prediction against the final result.